tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13486175.post7747909277567779768..comments2023-10-14T03:42:40.516-07:00Comments on Those Who Went Before: Mary Flagg b 2 Feb 1683-4Johttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12518797858366448475noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13486175.post-91081888573869288602016-03-18T05:39:44.900-07:002016-03-18T05:39:44.900-07:00Nice Information
Watertown KickboxingNice Information<br /><a href="http://powerhousekickboxing.com/kickboxing/" rel="nofollow">Watertown Kickboxing</a>Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05219523096781867097noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13486175.post-32871599636083217192010-03-25T21:18:18.629-07:002010-03-25T21:18:18.629-07:00I am not a Flagg descendant, but Mary's grandf...I am not a Flagg descendant, but Mary's grandfather Thomas Flagg is my 6th cousin 10 times removed. I am interested in cousins and thus post a lot of early American settlers, trying to straighten out the copying errors that occur from time to time.<br /> I tried to get you as a cousin but was only able to hook you to my internet tree.<br /> Dan RogersDan Rogershttp://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.ancestry.com/~dantrogers/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13486175.post-87521431823840588772010-03-12T21:34:52.101-08:002010-03-12T21:34:52.101-08:00Daniel, thank you for posting your comment. The t...Daniel, thank you for posting your comment. The text dated 19 July 1915 is I assume from the Boston Transcript column. His logic is sound and I have heard of other instances where Bond has gotten the women confused, understandably. I will use this information and sources to update my data. Again, thank you. Are you a Flagg descendent?Johttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12518797858366448475noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13486175.post-72619139484179925402010-03-10T10:07:39.325-08:002010-03-10T10:07:39.325-08:00At URL = http://wc.rootsweb.ancestry.com/cgi-bin/i...At URL = http://wc.rootsweb.ancestry.com/cgi-bin/igm.cgi?op=GET&db=ware&id=I7646<br />Lance Ware, (Ware/Erdman/Williams/Ingalsbe Family) presents his research on Mary Flagg, whose relatives are much confused. The Mary Flagg presented here (b. 2 Feb. 1682/3) is actually the husband of William Pike.<br /><br />John (3) Adams married Oct. 27, 1714, Mary Flagg, at Watertown. There were three granddaughters of old Thomas (1) Flagg at Watertown named Mary; and Bond has quite confused their marriages, and I have spent considerable study in straightening them out. Mary (3) (Allen 2, Thomas 1), born about 1690, married, according to Bond, 1706, William Pike of Framingham. Mary (3) (Michael 2, Thomas 1), born Dec. 7, 1690, married, according to Bond, Dec. 13, 1711, William Hagar. Mary (3) (Gershom 2, Thomas 1), born Feb. 2, 1682-3, married, accroding to Bond (with a question-mark), Oct. 27, 1714, John (3) Adams (George 2-1). Only Michael Flagg, of the three brothers, left a will, and in it, under date 1711, he mentions his daughter, Mary Flaggs, showing that she was unmarried then. Allen Flagg died 1712, and in settling the estate his widow, Sarah, mentions a sum of money due her son-in-law, William Hagar. This proves that Mary (3) (Allen 2, Thomas 1) was the one who married, Dec. 13, 1711, William Hagar. Mary (3) (Michael 2, Thomas 1) was unmarried in 1711, so it must have been Mary (3) (Gershom 2, Thomas 1) who married, 1706, William Pike, and her birthdate show she was of the right age. This leaves Mary (3) (Michael 2, Thomas 1), born Dec. 7, 1690, to marry, Oct. 27, 1714, John (3) Adams. She named a son Michael for her father, and a daughter Prudence for her sister. W. W. N. Y. Text: 19 Jul 1915, #4884 <br /><br />This straightens out the confusion on which Mary Flagg married which husband.Daniel T. Rogershttp://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.ancestry.com/~dantrogers/noreply@blogger.com